(06-Apr-20 09:45)Menalix Wrote:  All features is seperated in their own threads, use only triggerbot, and no other threads are executed

Last detection was February 2017, more than 3-years ago.

It's impossible to say how often, but with Valve's current anti-cheats plans, it doesn't seem like we will see a signature-based detection again.
What you might expect though is overwatch getting better, which mostly pose a risk to wallhackers and obvious aimbot users with bad settings.
What you could also expect is valve trying to detect feautures, which can be integrity checked with server variables, such as glow and radarhack, wouldn't pose a risk to triggerbot or aimbot.

We're external and Valve's new anti-cheat (VACnet) system is bad at catching externals, due to the code's execution flow is asynchronous to the game, where internals is synchronous. Synchronous execution is easyier data to rely on. Where asynchronous seems more legit, cause real user input is asynchronous as well.

(07-Apr-20 00:00)Ornahh25 Wrote:  

(06-Apr-20 09:45)Menalix Wrote:  All features is seperated in their own threads, use only triggerbot, and no other threads are executed

Last detection was February 2017, more than 3-years ago.

It's impossible to say how often, but with Valve's current anti-cheats plans, it doesn't seem like we will see a signature-based detection again.
What you might expect though is overwatch getting better, which mostly pose a risk to wallhackers and obvious aimbot users with bad settings.
What you could also expect is valve trying to detect feautures, which can be integrity checked with server variables, such as glow and radarhack, wouldn't pose a risk to triggerbot or aimbot.

We're external and Valve's new anti-cheat (VACnet) system is bad at catching externals, due to the code's execution flow is asynchronous to the game, where internals is synchronous. Synchronous execution is easyier data to rely on. Where asynchronous seems more legit, cause real user input is asynchronous as well.

Okay great yeah i that gives me confidence, since i am using my main obviously security is my #1 priority. Is this a cheat where like each person gets a unique one ? and do you guys update it like weekly or do you guys just wait for a vac wave to find out if its detected

(07-Apr-20 01:59)Ornahh25 Wrote:  Great, purchasing for sure i cheated yearsss ago and got pooped over and looking to know with a lot more to lose now so i made sure i did research and found what im looking for, also ive seen where people put their cheats on a usb, does that make it safer? is there an option for me to do this ? or does it make no difference ?


ALSO, i really appreciate you responding, first impression is already amazing.

(07-Apr-20 13:19)Menalix Wrote:  

(07-Apr-20 01:59)Ornahh25 Wrote:  Great, purchasing for sure i cheated yearsss ago and got pooped over and looking to know with a lot more to lose now so i made sure i did research and found what im looking for, also ive seen where people put their cheats on a usb, does that make it safer? is there an option for me to do this ? or does it make no difference ?


ALSO, i really appreciate you responding, first impression is already amazing.

No using USB does not make it safer, unless Valve did filescans, they don't do filescans, since it would slow your pc and give bad gaming performance, just like if your anti-virus did a file scan while you were gaming.
And they don't ban you for having cheats stored either, all the care about is running processes, we remotely inject the cheat to a different process, than the image on disk, therefor storing it on USB does not matter.

Cheats requiring USB or saying it's safer, is usually because they are an internal cheat, where there client needs to inject the game with a module.
That means their injector is running meanwhile VAC is running, and they can't delete file on disk due to the process running and windows have restriction, so as a ghetto fix to get around the windows restriction, the consumer can pull out the usb, and Valve won't be able to link injector process with a file on disk, which helps on some safety.
But our client is never running with VAC running at the same time, since we're not internal and don't have to inject the game.

(08-Apr-20 15:33)Ornahh25 Wrote:  

(07-Apr-20 13:19)Menalix Wrote:  

(07-Apr-20 01:59)Ornahh25 Wrote:  Great, purchasing for sure i cheated yearsss ago and got pooped over and looking to know with a lot more to lose now so i made sure i did research and found what im looking for, also ive seen where people put their cheats on a usb, does that make it safer? is there an option for me to do this ? or does it make no difference ?


ALSO, i really appreciate you responding, first impression is already amazing.

No using USB does not make it safer, unless Valve did filescans, they don't do filescans, since it would slow your pc and give bad gaming performance, just like if your anti-virus did a file scan while you were gaming.
And they don't ban you for having cheats stored either, all the care about is running processes, we remotely inject the cheat to a different process, than the image on disk, therefor storing it on USB does not matter.

Cheats requiring USB or saying it's safer, is usually because they are an internal cheat, where there client needs to inject the game with a module.
That means their injector is running meanwhile VAC is running, and they can't delete file on disk due to the process running and windows have restriction, so as a ghetto fix to get around the windows restriction, the consumer can pull out the usb, and Valve won't be able to link injector process with a file on disk, which helps on some safety.
But our client is never running with VAC running at the same time, since we're not internal and don't have to inject the game.

Okay and sorry i had another question, what is the most safest thing to do as far as keeping the cheat, so i only start it without steam or csgo running and end it while both arent running, but is there a certain folder or place in my pc i should keep it ?